|
|
Post by Mardox on Jun 17, 2015 5:01:05 GMT -5
Does it also include the other dragon-like creatures?
|
|
|
|
Post by Zhong on Jun 17, 2015 5:03:22 GMT -5
I guess it should. All of those in the dragon family.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mardox on Jun 17, 2015 5:04:48 GMT -5
Wyverns, hydras, tatzelwurms, Bluefurs, etc. etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by Zhong on Jun 17, 2015 5:07:22 GMT -5
It's like a super-cool, dragon-only club!
|
|
|
|
Post by Mardox on Jun 17, 2015 5:09:40 GMT -5
Indeed, but what the smaller sections such as genus?
|
|
|
|
Post by Zhong on Jun 17, 2015 5:12:58 GMT -5
That's right. There's still order, family, genus, and species.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mardox on Jun 17, 2015 5:14:59 GMT -5
Species is already done, the others are trickier.
|
|
|
|
Post by Zhong on Jun 17, 2015 5:20:02 GMT -5
Well, let's think. Primates is an order, and Lepidoptera is the order that contains all butterflies and moths. Rodentia is an order, too, but it's separate from Lagomorpha, which contains hares and rabbits.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mardox on Jun 17, 2015 5:22:20 GMT -5
So what criteria shall we use?
|
|
|
|
Post by Zhong on Jun 17, 2015 5:24:47 GMT -5
I'm thinking eastern vs. western.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mardox on Jun 17, 2015 5:27:00 GMT -5
What about the others that are dragon-like but not actually dragons? Shouldn't we identify them first?
|
|
|
|
Post by Zhong on Jun 17, 2015 5:38:48 GMT -5
Ah, yes. Even basilisks and cockatrices would probably fit into this class.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mardox on Jun 17, 2015 5:47:02 GMT -5
Indeed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Zhong on Jun 17, 2015 5:59:55 GMT -5
Ugh. This reclassification is more involved than I thought it'd be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mardox on Jun 17, 2015 6:13:53 GMT -5
Of course it is, it's already rather complex.
|
|
